da fezbet： The second in our series of articles examining how the Indian team is shaping up for the coming 2003-04 season
da bet nacional： S Rajesh07-Sep-2003The second in our series of articles examining how the Indian team is shaping up for the coming 2003-04 season.This one focusses on middle-order batsman.Of all the issues that the Indian team management need to address before the season begins, the middle order is the onewhich will worry them the least. Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly take care of the three slots from Nos. 3to 5, but No. 6 isn’t quite such an open-and-shut case. VVS Laxman is the most likely to take that place, but VirenderSehwag has evinced an interest to move down the order, while a clutch of others have staked their claims with strongperformances in the domestic season and with the A team. Moreover, with a tough tour of Australia coming up, India requirenot only a strong playing XI but also reliable bench-strength. Wisden CricInfo examines the cases for batsmen whoare contenders – but not quite certainties – for the middle-order slots, while three former cricketers give their opinions.VVSLaxman
Class, ability, temperament and runs against quality bowling attacks – Laxman has all these attributes in ample measure and isundoubtedly the frontrunner to take the No. 6 slot in the Indian Test line-up. Much has been made of his inability to live up toexpectations post his 281 two seasons back, but an average of nearly 54 in his last 14 Tests brooks little argument. Also, heaverages 56 against Australia, against whom India clash seven times over the next 15 months. Recently, though, Laxman’sfortune has suffered a bit of a blip. He was left out of India’s World Cup campaign, and had a miserable tour as captain of theA team in the West Indies, scoring 126 runs at 15.75. A side strain cut short that tour and scuppered his chances of touringwith the A team to England – a series in which a few of the other contenders for India’s middle-order berth staked their claimwith a bagful of runs. Laxman should make it to the Test side against New Zealand, but he will need to consistently be amongthe runs to ensure that he keeps his spot through the rest of the season.HemangBadani
After missing out on international cricket in the last couple of years, Badani is on the comeback trail. Not only did he scoreplenty of runs in the last domestic season, he made them in testing conditions. Especially impressive was a classy 109 againstMumbai in the Ranji Trophy final, when the rest of the batting succumbed to the pressure. He followed that up with consistentperformances on the A tour to England. Badani has the defensive technique, strokes and the temperament to be a success atTest level. With Mohammad Kaif and Yuvraj Singh having poor county seasons in England, Badani might well be the firstamong the reserves to get a look-in if one of the regular middle-order batsmen is laid off due to injury or loss of form.MohammadKaif
Kaif last got an opportunity at the Test level more than two years back, and though he didn’t quite grab that opportunity, he has grown in stature since then. His five-star performances have all been in one-day internationals, but Kaif’s organisedtechnique lends credence to the fact that he would be able to make a successful transition to Test cricket. Best of all, Kaif ispart of a young brigade which refuses to be overawed by reputations. Against the hard-nosed, all-conquering Australians, thattrait could be invaluable. Despite a mediocre season with Derbyshire – a first-class average of 22 with one fifty in eight matches- Kaif is a fair bet to make it to the Indian Test squad this season.YuvrajSingh
Yuvraj has firmly established himself as a key member of India’s ODI side, but a Test call-up might take a bit longer. Yuvraj’scredentials in the longer version of the game have been questioned – primarily due to a technique which revolves around staticfootwork and exceptional hand-eye coordination. However, he has proved in the past that he is not just a one-day specialist -on the A tour to South Africa in 2001-02, Yuvraj averaged 62, scoring a century against an attack which included Andre Nel,Dewald Pretorius and David Terbrugge. A wretched county season for Yorkshire – 145 runs at 14.50 – spoils his casesomewhat, though.VirenderSehwag
Sehwag started off with a sensational century on debut against South Africa at No. 6, but over the last year he has been thrustinto the opener’s slot. He hasn’t done too badly, but Sehwag opened the debate over his batting position by suggesting thathe’d prefer to bat in the middle order. In the six Tests when Sehwag’s batted down the order, he averages close to 48, nearlyten more than his average as an opener. If the team management does decide to move him down the order, there’ll be room foronly one out of Sehwag or Laxman.AmbatiRayudu
Touted as the next big hope for Indian middle-order batting, Rayudu has had the critics gushing about his scintillating strokeplayand his composure under pressure. Not yet 18, Rayudu has already been on two A tours with varying degrees of success: hewasn’t prolific in the West Indies, but averaged 87 in England. Experts reckon he is sure to play for India in the near future; ifhe gets among the runs in the domestic matches early this season, he could well find himself playing in the big league soonerthan most people expect.DineshMongia
Mongia got an extended run with the Indian one-day line-up, but failed to make the most of it. His technical failings around theoff stump will be exposed far more ruthlessly in Test cricket, especially by the likes of Glenn McGrath and Co. Mongia mightyet be in contention, but chances are he will have to go back to domestic cricket, work on his technique, score more runs, andstake his claim all over again.Expert views
WV Raman: It’s straightforward – it has to be Laxman at No. 6. With his past record and his ability, Laxman pickshimself. Among the others, I would pick Kaif and Yuvraj over the rest of the contenders. Both have plenty of internationalexperience and won’t be overawed – they have both played against the Australian fast bowlers, even if only in one-dayinternationals. Both are young, and Kaif, especially, is capable of playing long innings as well. These two I would rate just overBadani, who should also enjoy Australian tracks as he is a good striker of the ball. Rayudu probably needs a bit more time, inhis own interest. There’s no point in trying to thrust someone into the limelight, expect the world out of him, and then dump himwhen he doesn’t quite deliver.Jatin Paranjpe: I would play Sehwag at No. 6. However, if the selectors decide to keep Sehwag at the top of theorder, then Laxman would be my next pick at No. 6. Looking at India’s calendar over the next 18 months – apart from touringAustralia, India is hosting Australia and South Africa – we need a batting line-up which can put up runs on the board againstquality bowling attacks. As back-ups, I would pick Rayudu for the Australian tour. I would rather blood a young batsman as areserve than pick an experienced player and have him sit out. I believe he is ready to play top-class cricket – he has been on acouple of A tours and knows what to expect. Kaif would be my second back-up. I would not hold his county failure againsthim: he played at Derby, which is a very seamer-friendly venue.Ashok Malhotra: Undoubtedly, Laxman should bat at No. 6. He is a world class player. He is young, and has provedhimself in the past. I would prefer to keep Sehwag at the top of the order. That’s the only way both can play in the XI. BothKaif and Yuvraj have done their chances more harm than good with failures in the English county season, but I would pick Kaifas a back-up as he is a better prospect for Tests. I wouldn’t give too much credit to the runs scored by the India A batsmen inEngland: almost all the matches were played against second-string county teams against poor attacks on good tracks.Openings for openers
Finders, keepers
Turn, turn, turn
Up to speed
